Congress Protest Against CEC Gyanesh Kumar, Police Barricades in Chandigarh

Congress leaders and workers staged protests across Delhi and nationwide demanding the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Police set up barricades as protesters attempted to march towards the Bharatiya Janata Party headquarters. Party spokespersons raised allegations regarding irregularities in the voter list, changes to Form 6 without parliamentary approval, and internal dissent within the Election Commission where two commissioners reportedly raised multiple objections. The opposition demanded an impeachment motion in Parliament and claimed that democratic electoral procedures were undermined at the behest of the central government.

Nationwide demonstrations have erupted across major Indian cities, including Delhi, Chandigarh, and Patna, as the Congress party and INDIA bloc allies protest against the Chief Election Commissioner and the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision exercise. Police deployed water cannons and set up barricades as demonstrators marched towards political headquarters demanding the resignation and impeachment of the CEC over allegations of voter deletions and election rigging. Protesters accused the central government of orchestrating manipulation of electoral rolls, citing internal dissension where two Election Commissioners reportedly raised objections multiple times over several months. Conversely, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party dismissed the charges as baseless excuses stemming from anti-incumbency, defending the process. The Election Commission maintained that its digital platform remains secure, decentralised, and restricted to authorised personnel via unique credentials to prevent any malicious intervention.

Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar's scheduled visits to Meerut and Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh have been postponed amid political controversy and nationwide protests by the INDIA bloc. High-ranking sources within the Election Commission dismissed speculation connecting the deferrals to reports of internal dissent, stating that the decisions were taken days earlier and communicated to local district authorities via email. The poll body maintained that schedule changes are standard operational occurrences influenced by logistics, venue availability, and administrative factors, citing past rescheduling in Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and Ladakh. Addressing claims regarding friction within the multi-member Commission, sources noted that internal discussions, differing viewpoints, and consensus-building represent the normal functioning of a multi-member constitutional body. The Commission reiterated that final decisions are issued with requisite approval and that routine administrative adjustments should not be conflated with the political showdown surrounding the institution.

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay launched a fierce counter-attack against the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) during a political address ahead of upcoming by-elections. Addressing sustained attacks and criticism from the principal opposition party, Vijay defended his administration's governance and welfare delivery, asserting that borrowing was undertaken exclusively for public welfare rather than corruption. Directly challenging former Chief Minister M.K. Stalin and the DMK leadership over past corruption inquiries, including the Sarkaria Commission, Vijay declared that his government represents the people. He contrasted his welfare schemes—such as fare-free bus travel and power initiatives—with the DMK's governance record, underlining that the electoral contest in Tamil Nadu remains squarely between his party, Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), and the DMK.