Red Fort Blast: NIA Chargesheet Exposes Doctor Terror Module, University Links and Coordinated Plots

An NIA chargesheet accessed by India Today reveals details regarding the November 2025 Red Fort suicide blast case. The investigation details a terror conspiracy involving medical professionals led by Dr Umarun Nabi, an assistant professor of general medicine at Al-Falah University in Faridabad. The chargesheet outlines how the accused allegedly aimed to overthrow the democratically elected government through armed terrorism and suicide attacks. It states that Dr Nabi activated the improvised explosive device inside the vehicle during the blast that killed 11 people. The probe also points to the use of explosive materials, an Al-Qaeda offshoot manual titled Lone Mujahid Pocket Book, and propaganda material linked to the Ansar Ghazwat-ul-Hind module.

Political tensions escalate in Punjab as demands grow for the state Finance Minister to resign following the death of Gulzar Singh from the Valmiki community. Family members, including his mother, wife, and brother, have alleged torment and denial of traditional last rites. An independent, impartial, and time-bound investigation has been demanded into the misuse of power by the government.

The death of a man in Sangrur has triggered a political dispute in Punjab over the state's drug crisis. The deceased allegedly died by suicide after questioning the state finance minister over drug supply in his village and facing pressure to apologise. While opposition leaders demanded the minister's resignation, an impartial investigation, and accused the administration of harassment, the family stated they reached an understanding involving compensation and a government job with no pressure from authorities. Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann accused opposition parties of exploiting the tragedy for political gain while defending his government.

A television debate examined the political dispute surrounding the rendition of the national song Vande Mataram following parliamentary amendments regarding its protection. Discussions focused on the differing approaches taken by political allies, with the National Conference choosing to stand for the full six stanzas citing constitutional obligations, while the Congress maintained its traditional adherence to the two-stanza version formulated in nineteen thirty-seven. Representatives debated whether the requirement to sing the complete version constitutes an enforced loyalty test or a legitimate constitutional duty passed by Parliament. The panel also addressed ideological consistency, historical resolutions from the pre-independence era, and broader differences within political alliances over national symbols and legislative compliance.