Vietnamese crab exporter
Advertisement

UPI Payment System: 'Someone has to bear the cost', says Santosh Mehrotra

During a discussion on the UPI payment system, economist Santosh Mehrotra addressed the debate over merchant transaction charges and government subsidies. Mehrotra noted that the government has been subsidising merchants to the tune of 2,000 crore rupees annually using taxpayer money, arguing that public funds should not cover these expenses indefinitely. He stated that the cost of UPI operations should instead be apportioned among the three primary commercial beneficiaries: banks, platform owners, and merchants, pointing out that banks generate substantial annual profits. While acknowledging the risk that merchants might eventually pass on a portion of the 0.4 per cent charge to consumers, he emphasised that small merchants alone should not carry the entire burden. Mehrotra remarked, 'Someone has to bear the cost,' urging the government to act as a regulator to distribute the financial burden across all stakeholders. Additionally, he discussed concerns regarding foreign pressure on digital payment systems and ongoing trade deal negotiations.

Read More

VIDEOS FROM OTHER SECTIONS

LATEST VIDEOS

MDR on UPI Payments: Krishnamurthy Subramanian

Former Chief Economic Advisor Krishnamurthy Subramanian shares his perspective on the government's merchant discount rate (MDR) policy for UPI payments. Discussing UPI's role as a sovereign public good, he cautions against ad valorem transaction taxes and notes that merchants might shift back to cash transactions, incurring implicit opportunity costs. Instead of taxing transactions, he emphasizes utilizing the platform to drive credit creation in the economy. Subramanian points out that India's private credit-to-GDP ratio is around 60%, compared to the global average of 150%, offering massive scope for expansion. 'Utilize this for credit creation,' he asserts, explaining that interest income can sustainably fund infrastructure, technology, and cybersecurity needs.

Sameer Nigam on UPI MDR: 'We Don't Want Subsidies From The Government'

In an interview with Rajdeep Sardesai, PhonePe Co-founder and CEO Sameer Nigam shared his perspective on the government's decision to introduce a 0.4% Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) on UPI transactions above Rs 2,000. Defending the move, Nigam stated, "We don't want subsidies from the government. We stand on our own feet." He explained that the notion that digital payments cannot expand with an MDR is unfounded, remarking, "It was a myth to begin with that MDR had to be free for payments to take off." Nigam highlighted that 95% to 96% of peer-to-merchant transactions fall below the Rs 2,000 threshold and essential categories such as petrol, utilities, and insurance have flat fee caps. He dismissed concerns that merchants will pass charges onto consumers, emphasizing that UPI still offers the lowest MDR globally.

Row Over 0.4% UPI Levy on Transactions Above ₹2,000 as Opposition and BJP Clash

A political controversy has erupted following the National Payments Corporation of India's announcement of a 0.4% merchant discount rate levy on Unified Payments Interface transactions exceeding 2,000 rupees. The opposition has criticised the decision, alleging that the move surrenders to American pressure and benefits digital payment companies with significant foreign shareholding. In response, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party rejected the allegations, clarifying that the merchant discount rate charge will be borne exclusively by merchants rather than consumers. The government maintained that 96% of transactions remain unaffected, stating the charge ensures platform robustness without impacting the public.

advertisement

US House To Vote On Russian Oil Bill: India Faces Threat Of 100% Tariffs

The US House of Representatives is set to vote on a key bill that proposes tariffs of up to 100% on countries purchasing Russian oil, potentially impacting Indian goods. Having previously passed the US Senate on August 8, the legislation has been fast-tracked and now heads towards the US House. If approved by the US Congress and signed into law by the US President, it would grant the authority to impose secondary tariffs on nations trading in Russian oil. The measure gives presidential discretion on whether and where to levy such penalties, raising concerns in India over the weaponisation of international trade tariffs.