Vietnamese crab exporter
Advertisement

Statecraft With Geeta Mohan | India's VanDyke Mystery: What Changed Behind The Scenes?

Why did India drop the UAPA charges against US national Matthew VanDyke and six Ukrainian nationals after initially arresting them in a case involving alleged drone warfare training in Myanmar?

The NIA had alleged that the seven entered India, travelled through Mizoram into Myanmar and trained ethnic armed groups in drone assembly, operations and electronic jamming. The agency also alleged that drones and components were brought from Europe through India.

On September 4, the NIA told a Delhi court that it had information linking the group to an attack on a civilian aircraft in Myanmar. But just four days later, the chargesheet invoked the Immigration and Foreigners Act instead of the UAPA.

The NIA says it needs more time to establish whether UAPA offences were committed and could file a supplementary chargesheet.

But the case raises bigger questions about India’s Myanmar frontier, the movement of foreign nationals, drone technology and the possibility of military expertise crossing borders.

Could the original terrorism case have weakened because the evidence was insufficient? Or did external pressure play a role?

This is the VanDyke case — and the questions surrounding India’s decision to step back from the UAPA charges.
 

Read More

VIDEOS FROM OTHER SECTIONS

LATEST VIDEOS

Cockroach spotted at Mumbai five-star hotel, expert flags food safety issue

A baby cockroach spotted on a dining table at Mumbai’s five-star JW Marriott hotel has sparked concern after Fortis Escorts Heart Institute Chief Dr Ashok Seth shared a video of the insect on social media. Seth said the incident ruined his appetite and urged Maharashtra FDA Commissioner Tukaram Munde to intervene. The incident comes amid a food safety enforcement drive by the FDA. Munde has said the department conducted over 12,000 inspections in 100 days, issued more than 5,000 improvement notices and suspended around 600 food licences during the campaign.

India First: Tuhin Sinha, Brijesh Kalappa, Shehzad Poonawalla on Vande Mataram Row

On India First with Gaurav Sawant, panellists debate major political rows surrounding national identity, secularism, and constitutional principles. The discussion examines the controversy over singing the national song, Vande Mataram, and the Karnataka legal dispute regarding legislative competence over limiting the song to two stanzas, with BJP national spokesperson Tuhin Sinha and Congress national spokesperson Brijesh Kalappa trading historical and political arguments alongside political analysts Shehzad Poonawalla and Rashid Kidwai. The broadcast also addresses the political fallout over remarks by former Vice President Hamid Ansari and Congress leader Rahul Gandhi concerning nationalism, religiosity, and Sharia courts. Panellists further analyse the ideological distinctions between Hinduism and Hindutva, the presence of religious figures in electoral politics, and allegations of minority appeasement versus secular governance under the Indian Constitution.

Hamid Ansari Cites Nehru On Communalism; BJP And Cleric Hit Out Over Remarks

Former Vice President Hamid Ansari has triggered a political controversy after citing an observation attributed to India's first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru during the A.G. Noorani Memorial Lecture. Quoting from a book, Ansari highlighted Nehru's remark stating that Hindu right-wing communalism posed a greater threat to India than communism. The Bharatiya Janata Party attacked the comments, alleging they reflected the ideological stance of the Congress party. Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath criticised the statement as an insult to Sanatan traditions. Additionally, cleric Umar Ahmed Ilyasi accused Ansari of provoking Muslims, while defenders highlighted Ansari's background as a diplomat, scholar, and member of an esteemed family.

advertisement

Row Over Mimicry Skit In Indore, Politics Of Satire & Hamid Ansari's Statement Trigger Fresh Faceoff

A major political controversy has erupted following a skit performed at an event in Indore. The performance, which involved a mimicry of the Prime Minister and an incident involving an elderly lady, drew sharp criticism from the Bharatiya Janata Party, which accused the organisers of insulting women and misleading the youth. In response, the Congress defended the act as satire and not a serious statement, while questioning past remarks against its own leadership. The incident comes amid ongoing debates over political satire, past skits on foreign policy, and remarks by the former Vice President that have triggered further political confrontation.