Vietnamese crab exporter
Advertisement

Statecrtaft With Geeta Mohan: Will India Back Putin's Plan For A New SCO Bank?

Could Vladimir Putin’s proposed SCO Development Bank become a major challenge to America’s financial power?

At the SCO summit in Bishkek, Putin called for an independent development bank that could finance infrastructure, energy, transport, technology and cross-border projects among member states. The bigger objective: reducing dependence on Western financial systems, the dollar and sanctions.

India is now part of the conversation. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman discussed financial cooperation with Russian Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, including the proposed SCO Development Bank. Kazakhstan has also offered to host its headquarters if SCO members agree to establish it.

But there is a major question: how would Donald Trump and Washington respond?

Russia says more than 98% of its settlements with SCO members are already conducted in national currencies, while India-Russia trade is increasingly using rupee-rouble mechanisms. If the proposed bank becomes a real institution, it could give SCO members another channel for financing and trade.

However, the bank does not exist yet. Its capital structure, governance, headquarters and lending rules remain unresolved.

So could Putin’s plan weaken the dollar’s influence, strengthen China’s economic reach and give India another instrument of strategic autonomy? Or could Washington use sanctions to stop it?

Watch the full analysis.

Read More

VIDEOS FROM OTHER SECTIONS

LATEST VIDEOS

'We Should Not Have Some Kind Of Pre-Approvals': Justice Kaul

In an exclusive conversation on India Today, former Supreme Court judge Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul addressed key revelations from his memoir, 'Without Fear or Favour', examining the delicate dynamics between the judiciary and the executive. Justice Kaul clarified his critique of former Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud regarding judicial appointments, stating, "We should not have some kind of a pre-approvals from the government." Emphasizing institutional independence, he noted that if judges remain firm and explain their rationale, the government is generally willing to cooperate. He reflected on the void left by late Union Minister Arun Jaitley, whom he identified as an effective bridge of trust between both organs of state. Justice Kaul also addressed caste calculations influencing appointments, the fallout of the struck-down NJAC, bench neutrality in sensitive cases like Rafale, and why judges need adaptation while facing relentless social media scrutiny.

EC Decisions Debate: 'Election Commission of India is a caged tiger now', says Dushyant Dave

A debate on the Election Commission of India focuses on its sworn affidavit filed before the Supreme Court claiming that its decisions were unanimous, amidst reported dissent from two election commissioners regarding Form 6 and the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process. Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave criticises constitutional bodies, remarking, 'Election Commission of India is a caged tiger now', and stating he takes the poll body's affidavit 'not with a pinch of salt, but with a bag full of salt'. He asserts that executive pressure has compromised institutional independence. In contrast, former Uttarakhand High Court judge Justice Lokpal Singh defends the commission, stating that an affidavit submitted to the Supreme Court must be accepted in its true spirit as filing a false affidavit carries severe legal consequences. The discussion delves into file notings, unaddressed objections, judicial independence, and democratic accountability.

advertisement