Judges Clash Over SIR Exercise, Voter Deletions and Disenfranchisement
A debate has emerged surrounding the Special Intensive Revision exercise after differing perspectives were voiced regarding the deletion of voters from electoral rolls. Supreme Court Judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan criticised mass disenfranchisement, terming arbitrary deletions unconstitutional and highlighting that voting rights remain central to Indian democracy under Articles 14 and 326. He warned that depriving citizens of voting rights reduces them to second-class citizens. Conversely, former Uttarakhand High Court judge Justice Lokpal Singh defended the Election Commission of India's revision process, citing concerns over fake voters and illegal infiltration in border states such as West Bengal and Bihar. The discussion comes as multiple public interest litigations and court benches monitor deletions, appeal mechanisms, and software errors impacting voter lists across several states.





