Things seem to have slowed down somewhat in the world of AI. We are no longer getting frontier models every couple of weeks. The Chinese labs are relatively silent. The likes of OpenAI, Meta and Google are trying to consolidate whatever they currently have. Anthropic is busy with its IPO, which should hit the market in a few days from now.
Instead, the hot story in AI this week has been the sordid saga at Nvidia. After multiple affairs, with multiple personal and public implications, came out, Nvidia founder and CEO Jensen Huang is out at the company. It all happened rather quickly, with Huang leaving the company — or rather forced to leave the company — within days of his affairs with Chinese entrepreneur Alice Huang and Nvidia VP Kimberly Powell came out in public.
Much has been written about the affairs. So, I am not going to get into them. Instead, I want to talk about how the Jensen saga threatens to prick the AI bubble. You see Nvidia is not just another tech company and Jensen is not just another tech CEO.
Nvidia and, more notably, Jensen with his close personal relations across industries are at the centre of our current AI world. While OpenAI, Anthropic and others are the companies behind AI chatbots we all talk to, Nvidia supplies the goods that make AI a possibility. It has been there since the very beginning around 13 to 14 years ago. Its silicon chips and CUDA software have been key to almost all the major AI developments that have happened in the last 15 years.
But it is not Nvidia’s technology that underpins the AI bubble. The technology underpins only the AI technology. The bubble, as many recognise it after seeing the amount of money companies and punters are spending on AI, has been partly fuelled by the way Nvidia and Jensen have gone about their business.
Jensen, for obvious reasons, has been one of the biggest cheerleaders for AI. After all, more AI means Nvidia can sell more chips. But his cheerleading has not been only about words. He has actually put his money where his mouth is. As Nvidia has earned record profits in the last couple of years, the company has invested back a lot of this money in AI startups. This has led to what many call a perverse loop: Nvidia invests money in AI companies, the same money is then used by the AI companies to buy Nvidia chips, which essentially increases Nvidia profits, so then Nvidia invests a portion of its profits back into AI companies.
And round and round we go.
In addition, Jensen and Nvidia have also done a fair amount of deal making with other AI companies. It has entered into forward-looking partnerships to supply chips and hardware for data centres that are yet to materialise. But such deals, by their nature, have inflated the financial size of the AI world, even if materially there is nothing behind them.
It’s a gravy train. Nvidia is its engine.
But Nvidia is now under pressure and is taking a beating. In one month Nvidia share is down by a little over 25 per cent. The company no longer has a CEO. It also no longer likely has a viable plan to do any serious business in the Chinese market, more so because Jensen’s alleged affair with Alice also has geopolitical flavour to it. In fact, in a way, Jensen is synonymous with Nvidia. Given that he is no longer in the driving seat, there is a very real chance that Nvidia will find it difficult to sustain its momentum.
If Nvidia loses momentum, the rest of the AI gravy train too hits breaks. What will that do to the bubble? We will see.





