US judge blocks Trump's move to limit student loan forgiveness programme
The Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program (PSLF) allows borrowers to have their federal student loans forgiven after 10 years working for government or non-profit employers.
A federal judge on Tuesday blocked US President Donald Trump's administration from implementing a new rule stripping public service workers of eligibility for federal student loan forgiveness if it deems their employers to have a "substantial illegal purpose."
US District Judge Myong Joun in Boston sided with Democratic-led states, cities and nonprofits that argued the Department of Education's rule would allow it to target groups supporting immigration rights, transgender healthcare and other causes the Trump administration disfavours by disqualifying them from the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program (PSLF).
That programme allows borrowers to have their federal student loans forgiven after 10 years working for government or non-profit employers. More than 1 million borrowers have received debt relief since Congress established it in 2007.
Trump has argued the programme has been exploited by activist organisations that harm US national security and values, and ordered the Education Department to narrow eligibility.
Joun, who was appointed by former Democratic President Joe Biden, said Congress designed the programme to encourage people to pursue careers in public service even when jobs require educational training that imposes substantial financial burdens on them.
He said the Education Department now wanted to disqualify employers, and consequently borrowers, from participating in the programme by redefining what constitutes a "public service" job without any legal authority to do so based on policy objectives that Congress never identified as relevant for eligibility.
Joun said it was doing so through a rule that also unconstitutionally discriminates on the basis of viewpoint in violation of the US Constitution's First Amendment by targeting non-profit employers engaged in speech and activities that run counter to Trump's agenda.
"Indeed, the record further demonstrates that the Final Rule has already chilled protected speech," the judge wrote.
As a result, Joun struck down the rule ahead of it taking effect on Wednesday.
Under Secretary of Education Nicholas Kent, in a statement, said the Education Department is evaluating next steps for its "commonsense policy."
"The Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program is intended to support Americans who serve the public good, not to subsidize organizations that engage in terrorism, facilitate illegal immigration, or support the mutilation of children," he said.
LOYALTY TEST
New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat who helped lead 22 states and the District of Columbia in a legal challenge to the rule, said the ruling "stopped the federal government from turning a program created to honor public service into a weapon for political retaliation."
"Public servants should not have to pass a political loyalty test to earn the loan forgiveness they were promised," she said in a statement.
Trump in a March 2025 executive order said the programme has "misdirected tax dollars into activist organizations that not only fail to serve the public interest, but actually harm our national security and American values."
His order directed the Education Department to revise regulations governing the programme to redefine what constitutes "public service" work to exclude organisations that engage in activities that have a "substantial illegal purpose."
The Education Department did so with a final rule that it published in October that defined "substantial illegal purpose" as covering activities that include aiding illegal immigration; supporting terrorism; engaging in illegal discrimination; and participating in the "chemical and surgical castration or mutilation of children."
The plaintiffs sued in November to have the rule blocked from taking effect, saying it was clearly designed to target causes the administration disfavours.
Joun said the rule "does just that by threatening to revoke PSLF eligibility from borrowers who, among other things, lawfully assist immigrants; teach diversity, equity, and inclusion practices; and facilitate gender-affirming care."