No Pakistani Kashmir: India slams NYT over misleading headline on POK elections
India criticised The New York Times for referring to Pakistan-occupied Kashmir as "Pakistani Kashmir", calling the term misleading and reaffirming that the region is an integral part of India.
India has strongly objected to The New York Times referring to Pakistan-occupied Kashmir as "Pakistani Kashmir", calling the description "misleading and incorrect" and reiterating that the region is an integral part of India.
The criticism came after The New York Times published a report on clashes and local elections in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The report said violence had erupted in Mirpur as police confronted members of the Joint Awami Action Committee, a civil rights group protesting alleged police excesses.
It also reported that at least two people had died from gunshot wounds in the latest unrest and cited the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan's call for an independent investigation into the violence.
Responding to the report, the Indian Embassy in the US took exception to the newspaper's use of the term "Pakistani Kashmir" in its headline.
"There is no Pakistani Kashmir, only Pakistan-occupied Kashmir," the embassy said in a post, rejecting the terminology used by the newspaper.
The embassy reiterated that the Union Territories of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh have been, are, and will always remain an integral and inalienable part of India.
It also said Pakistan continues to illegally occupy parts of these territories and accused Islamabad of using violence against people living in the occupied areas.
The New York Times reported that the violence came amid weeks of unrest that have left dozens dead and overshadowed local elections in the region. The newspaper also said the Joint Awami Action Committee had alleged that several of its supporters were killed in clashes with police, although those claims could not be independently verified and had not been officially confirmed.
India has consistently maintained that the entire Union Territories of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh are an integral part of the country.
India has strongly objected to The New York Times referring to Pakistan-occupied Kashmir as "Pakistani Kashmir", calling the description "misleading and incorrect" and reiterating that the region is an integral part of India.
The criticism came after The New York Times published a report on clashes and local elections in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The report said violence had erupted in Mirpur as police confronted members of the Joint Awami Action Committee, a civil rights group protesting alleged police excesses.
It also reported that at least two people had died from gunshot wounds in the latest unrest and cited the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan's call for an independent investigation into the violence.
Responding to the report, the Indian Embassy in the US took exception to the newspaper's use of the term "Pakistani Kashmir" in its headline.
"There is no Pakistani Kashmir, only Pakistan-occupied Kashmir," the embassy said in a post, rejecting the terminology used by the newspaper.
The embassy reiterated that the Union Territories of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh have been, are, and will always remain an integral and inalienable part of India.
It also said Pakistan continues to illegally occupy parts of these territories and accused Islamabad of using violence against people living in the occupied areas.
The New York Times reported that the violence came amid weeks of unrest that have left dozens dead and overshadowed local elections in the region. The newspaper also said the Joint Awami Action Committee had alleged that several of its supporters were killed in clashes with police, although those claims could not be independently verified and had not been officially confirmed.
India has consistently maintained that the entire Union Territories of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh are an integral part of the country.
India has strongly objected to The New York Times referring to Pakistan-occupied Kashmir as "Pakistani Kashmir", calling the description "misleading and incorrect" and reiterating that the region is an integral part of India.
The criticism came after The New York Times published a report on clashes and local elections in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The report said violence had erupted in Mirpur as police confronted members of the Joint Awami Action Committee, a civil rights group protesting alleged police excesses.
It also reported that at least two people had died from gunshot wounds in the latest unrest and cited the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan's call for an independent investigation into the violence.
Responding to the report, the Indian Embassy in the US took exception to the newspaper's use of the term "Pakistani Kashmir" in its headline.
"There is no Pakistani Kashmir, only Pakistan-occupied Kashmir," the embassy said in a post, rejecting the terminology used by the newspaper.
The embassy reiterated that the Union Territories of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh have been, are, and will always remain an integral and inalienable part of India.
It also said Pakistan continues to illegally occupy parts of these territories and accused Islamabad of using violence against people living in the occupied areas.
The New York Times reported that the violence came amid weeks of unrest that have left dozens dead and overshadowed local elections in the region. The newspaper also said the Joint Awami Action Committee had alleged that several of its supporters were killed in clashes with police, although those claims could not be independently verified and had not been officially confirmed.
India has consistently maintained that the entire Union Territories of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh are an integral part of the country.
